A griefer or bad faith player is a player in a multiplayer video game who deliberately irritates and harasses other players within the game (trolling), using aspects of the game in unintended ways.[1] A griefer derives pleasure primarily or exclusively from the act of annoying other users, and as such is a particular nuisance in online gaming communities. To qualify as griefing, a player must be using aspects of the game in unintended ways to annoy other players—if they are trying to gain a strategic advantage, it is instead called 'cheating'.

  1. The Psychology Of Cheating In Video Games Using
  2. Psychology Of Cheating In Video Games
  3. Psychology Of Games
  4. The Psychology Of Cheating In Video Games Free
  5. Psychology Today Video Games

Cheating in video games involves a video game player using non-standard methods for creating an advantage beyond normal gameplay, usually to make the game easier, or may also create unusual effects which do not necessarily make the game easier to play, such as giving characters different appearances, such as large heads.


The term was applied to online, multiplayer video games by the year 2000 or earlier, as illustrated by postings to the rec.games.computer.ultima.online USENET group.[2] The player is said to cause 'grief' in the sense of 'giving someone grief'.

The term 'griefing' dates to the late 1990s, when it was used to describe the willfully antisocial behaviors seen in early massively multiplayer online games like Ultima Online and first-person shooters such as Counter-Strike. Even before it had a name, griefer-like behavior was familiar in the virtual worlds of text-based Multi-User Domains (MUDs), where joyriding invaders visited 'virtual rape' and similar offenses on the local populace.[3] Julian Dibbell's 1993 article A Rape in Cyberspace analyzed the griefing events in a particular MUD, LambdaMOO, and the staff's response.

In the culture of massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPGs) in Taiwan, such as Lineage, griefers are known as 'white-eyed'—a metaphor meaning that their eyes have no pupils and so they look without seeing. Behaviors other than griefing that can cause players to be stigmatized as 'white-eyed' include cursing, cheating, stealing, or unreasonable killing.[4]


Methods of griefing differ from game to game. What might be considered griefing in one area of a game may even be an intended function or mechanic in another area. Common methods may include but are not limited to:

  • Intentional friendly fire or deliberately performing actions detrimental to other team members' game performance.
    • Wasting or destroying key game elements
    • Colluding with opponents
    • Giving false information
    • Faking extreme incompetence with the intent of hurting teammates or failing an in-game objective
    • Deliberately blocking shots from a player's own team, or blocking a player's view by standing in front of them so they cannot damage the enemy[5]
    • Trapping teammates in inescapable locations by using physics props, special abilities, or teleportation
  • Actions undertaken to waste other players' time.
    • Playing as slowly as possible
    • Hiding from an enemy when there is no tactical benefit in doing so
    • If a game interface element has no time limit, leaving their computer (going 'AFK'), potentially forcing the other players to leave the game (which may incur a penalty for leaving), like Among Us.
    • Constantly pausing the game or lowering its speed as much as possible, in the hopes that their target quit in frustration
  • Causing a player disproportionate loss or reversing their progress.
    • Destroying or vandalizing other players' creations without permission in sandbox games like Minecraft and Terraria
    • Driving vehicles backwards around lapped courses in multiplayer racing games, often done with the intent of crashing head-on into whoever is in first place
  • Using exploits (taking advantage of bugs in a game).
    • Illegally exiting a map's boundaries to prevent the enemy team from winning
    • In a co-op or multiplayer game, destroying or otherwise denying access to items without which other players cannot finish the game
  • Purposeful violation of server rules or guidelines.
    • Impersonation of administrators or other players through similar screen names
    • Written or verbal insults, including false accusations of cheating or griefing
  • Spamming a voice or text chat channel to inconvenience, harass or annoy other players.
  • Uploading offensive or explicit images to profile pictures, in-game sprays, or game skins.
  • Kill stealing, denying another player the satisfaction or gain of killing a target that should have been theirs.
  • Camping at a corpse or spawn area to repeatedly kill players as they respawn (when players have no method of recourse to prevent getting killed), preventing them from being able to play. Camping can also refer to continuously waiting in a tactically advantageous position for others to come to them; this is sometimes considered griefing because if all players do it, the game stalls, but this is now more commonly considered a game design issue.
  • Acting out-of-character in a role-play setting to disrupt the serious gameplay of others.
  • Luring many monsters or a single larger monster to chase the griefer, before moving to where other players are. The line of monsters in pursuit looks like a train, and hence this is sometimes called 'training' or 'aggroing'.[6]
  • Blocking other players so they cannot move to or from a particular area, or access an in-game resource (such as a non-player character); the game Tom Clancy's The Division was found to have a serious problem with this at launch, where griefers could stand in the doorway out of the starting area, trapping players in the spawn room.[7]
  • Intentionally attempting to crash a server through lag or other means (such as spawning large amounts of resource-demanding objects), in order to cause interference among players.
  • Smurfing, the process of creating extra accounts and deliberately losing games to enter a lower skill rank than is appropriate, before playing at full skill against lower-ranked opponents, thus defeating them easily.
  • High-skill players deliberately losing in matches against low-skill players (usually due to shortage of players), causing the low-skill player's skill rating to artificially rise, so that they will be routinely pitted against opponents they have no chance of winning against in the future.
  • Impersonating an enemy to trick someone into attacking the griefer so that a player is flagged as having attacked the griefer. A notable example of this is early on in Ultima Online, where players had a scroll that could change their appearance to that of a monster, with the only way to tell the difference between them and a real monster being to click on them and read their name. Attacking a monster disguised griefer would flag the player as a murderer causing the town guard to kill the player.

The term is sometimes applied more generally[8] to refer to a person who uses the internet to cause distress to others as a prank,[9][10] or to intentionally inflict harm, as when it was used to describe an incident in March 2008, when malicious users posted seizure-inducing animations on epilepsy forums.[11][12][13]

Industry response[edit]

Many subscription-based games actively oppose griefers, since their behavior can drive away business.[14] It is common for developers to release server-side upgrades and patches to annul griefing methods. Many online games employ gamemasters that reprimand offenders. Some use a crowdsourcing approach, where players can report griefing. Malicious players are then red-flagged, and are then dealt with at a gamemaster's discretion. As many as 25% of customer support calls to companies operating online games deal specifically with griefing.[15]

Blizzard Entertainment has enacted software components to combat griefing.[16] To prevent non-consensual attacks between players, some games such as Ultima Online have created separate realms for those who wish to be able to attack anyone at any time, and for those who do not. Others implemented separate servers.

When EverQuest was released, Sony included a PvP switch where people could fight each other only if they had enabled that option. This was done in order to prevent the player-killing that was driving people away from Ultima Online, which at that time had no protection on any of its servers.[17]

Second Life bans players for harassment (defined as being rude or threatening, making unwelcome sexual advances, or performing activities likely to annoy or alarm somebody) and assault (shooting, pushing, or shoving in a safe area, or creating scripted objects that target another user and hinder their enjoyment of the game) in its community standards.[18] Sanctions include warnings, suspension from Second Life, or being banned altogether.

Some space simulators, like Eve Online, have incorporated activities typically considered griefing as part of the gameplay mechanism. Corporate spying, theft, scams, gate-camping, and PvP on non-PvP players are all part of their gaming experience.[19]

The Psychology Of Cheating In Video Games Using

Shooters such as Counter Strike: Global Offensive have implemented peer review systems, where if a player is reported too many times, multiple higher ranked players are allowed to review the player and determine if the reports are valid, and apply a temporary ban to the player's account if necessary. The player's name is omitted during the replay, as well as those of the other 9 players in the game. In October 2016, Valve implemented a change that will permanently ban a player if he/she receives two penalties for griefing.

Many Minecraft servers have rules against griefing. In Minecraft freebuild servers, griefing is often the destruction of another player's build, and in other servers the definition ranges, but almost all servers recognize harassment as griefing. Most servers use temporary bans for minor and/or first-time incidents, and indefinite bans from the server for more serious and/or repeat offences.

In recent years, Grand Theft Auto Online has experienced a drastic increase in griefing due in part to the emergence of bugs and better money-making opportunities. Common griefing techniques within the game abuse passive mode and trivially accessible weaponized vehicles.[20] Developer Rockstar has implemented measures such as a longer cool-down on passive mode, patching invincibility glitches, and removing passive mode from weaponized vehicles in recent updates. In addition, the game also features a reputation system that, in effect, after excessive 'bad sport point' accumulation, will mark players as 'bad sports', allowing them to only play in lobbies with other 'bad sports'. Such points are either accumulated over time or gained within a certain time frame and are acquired by actions such as destroying another player's personal vehicle, or quitting jobs early. This is one of the more controversial features of the game, as some point out flaws such as the game not considering if destruction of a vehicle was self-defense.[citation needed]

Fallout 76 discourages players from griefing by marking them as wanted criminals, which one can get a reward for killing. Wanted players cannot see any other players on the world map and must rely on their normal player view.

Popular culture[edit]

In the South Park episode 'Make Love, Not Warcraft', the children attempt to vanquish a griefer in World of Warcraft.

See also[edit]


  1. ^Warner, Dorothy; Raiter, Mike (December 2005). 'Social Context in Massively-Multiplayer Online Games (MMOGs): Ethical Questions in Shared Space'(PDF). International Review of Information Ethics. 4.
  2. ^'Google Groups: August 14, 2000 rec.games.computer.ultima.online'. Retrieved 16 June 2015.
  3. ^Dibbell, Julian (18 January 2008). 'Mutilated Furries, Flying Phalluses: Put the Blame on Griefers, the Sociopaths of the Virtual World'. Wired. WIRED magazine. Archived from the original on 8 May 2011. Retrieved 18 May 2012.
  4. ^Holin Lin; Chuen-Tsai Sun (2007), ''White-Eyed' and 'Griefer' Player Culture: Deviance Construction in MMORPGs', Worlds in Play: International Perspectives on Digital Games Research, pp. 106 et seq, ISBN9780820486437
  5. ^'Meet the Griefers'. Eurogamer.net. 4 January 2012. Retrieved 16 June 2015.
  6. ^'The Griefer Future'. Retrieved 16 June 2015.
  7. ^'The Division Trolls Are Blocking Other Players' Progress By Standing In A Doorway'. Kotaku. Retrieved 12 October 2019.
  8. ^Dibbell, Julian (2009). 'Mutilated Furries, Flying Phalluses: Put the Blame on Griefers, the Sociopaths of the Virtual World'. In Johnson, Steven (ed.). The Best Technology Writing 2009. Grand Rapids, Michigan: University of Michigan Press. pp. 9–19. ISBN978-0-300-15410-8. Retrieved 10 February 2010.
  9. ^Nick Douglas, Internet's Most Wanted: A Rogue's GalleryArchived 2009-07-16 at the Wayback Machine, Jan 25 2007,
  10. ^Craigslist Griefer Ordered To Pay Up Over Both Copyright And Privacy Violations (accessed April 26, 2009)
  11. ^Kevin Poulsen, March 28, 2008, 'Hackers Assault Epilepsy Patients via Computer', Wired.
  12. ^Cory Doctorow, March 31, 2008, 'Griefers deface epilepsy message-board with seizure-inducing animations', Boing Boing.
  13. ^See also 'lulz', for griefer slang referring to enjoyment at others' expense.
  14. ^Pham, Alex (2 September 2002). 'Online Bullies Give Grief to Gamers'. Main News. Los Angeles Times. p. 1. Archived from the original on 9 October 2007.
  15. ^Davies, Martin (15 June 2006). 'Gamers don't want any more grief'. The Guardian.
  16. ^'Official forum changes, real life names to be displayed'. Archived from the original on 19 June 2013. Retrieved 2 May 2013.
  17. ^Glenn Barnett (1 April 2000). 'Darktide Rising'.
  18. ^'Community Standards'. Retrieved 16 June 2015.
  19. ^'Griefing'. Evelopedia. Archived from the original on 27 May 2014. Retrieved 26 May 2014. In EVE, 'griefing' refers to various activities, some of which can be argued not to be 'griefing' in the classic sense, but parts of valid gameplay.[better source needed]
  20. ^O'Connor, Alice (13 March 2020). 'Watch out: GTA Online's most reviled griefmobile is cheap this week'. Rock, Paper, Shotgun. Retrieved 30 October 2020.

External links[edit]

Look up griefer in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
  • Documented incident of griefing during a virtual interview, see also Anshe Chung
  • Research paper on griefing. To view this PDF paper, the host website requires a subscription to the digital library.
  • 'Feature: The Griefer Within', GamePro.
  • Can you grief it? - feature article at VideoGamer.com
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Griefer&oldid=995278051'

Bargh, Chen, and Burrows also did another experiment where some people unscrambled sentences with words related to rudeness (bold, bother, brazen) and some worked with words indicating politeness (patiently, courteous, unobtrusively). All subjects then walked in on a staged scene where they had to interrupt a conversation to get some needed information. Those in the “polite” condition waited 9.3 minutes on average. Those in the “rude” condition jumped in after just 5.5 minutes on average.3

These are examples of what psychologists called “priming,” which is basically getting people in a particular state of mind or getting them to think about what you want them to. It’s a staple of advertising and surprisingly easy to do. I’ve been thinking for a while that game developers should take better advantage of it.

Psychology Of Cheating In Video Games

What if, for example, certain words of phrases were thrown around on loading screens between levels or in the matchmaking lobby for a multiplayer shooter? Would simply showing words like “sportsmanship” or “communication” or “fairness” prime people to behave themselves during games? If you didn’t want to be that transparent, you could include little stories, vignettes, or even comics or movies that included those words or illustrations of them. Or maybe you could use real data, like the number of heals provided by players in the previous game or awards for best defense.

This makes me wonder...

...I think I shall now try greeting every crappy LFD group (by now, I despise the dungeon finder) with some happy, perky bounces, and see if that works with priming the groups to act more decently in general, thereby improving my LFD grouping experiences.

I do usually try to greet people with at least a, 'Hullo!' However, for the purposes of this experiment, I think I'll try to be a little bit odder, and work in 'polite' words for killing everything in sight, and see if that works better.

E.g.: Woohoo! Hi guys! Lettuce go forth and politely divest all the mobbies of their tasty loot with civility and gentleness!

(Assuming they have a certain level of mastery of the English language, it should at least be 'ha, this person is odd' even if it's not actually amusing - and it will hopefully, prime everyone with polite words.)

Certainly, when I made mistakes when I started tanking again (even though only low level) for the first time in 2 years, and I explained exactly that, the group was a lot more forgiving than it would have been had I said nothing.

Pair that with how apology has the tendency (if perceived as sincere) to cancel out the effects of annoyance...

...I shall run my little social experiment and report back inna bit!

More observations:
This is the line I've been using. I've had to macro it, because groups are so gogogogogo these days I don't have TIME to type it... and I type really fast.
/p Hi guys! The PUG runs I've had from LFD lately have been great. Good, polite folk - let's hope this is one of them too.

Unfortunately, I can only do this once per run. This is a problem because of folks dropping out / being kicked, etc, and it would be suspicious to keep saying it every time someone new shows up.

Psychology Of Games

Only have one sample so far, so can't really comment - off to get more!

Samples (I may split this off eventually or this will get awfully long)
With Priming
1) RFK - good
2) RFK - good
3) DM - good

4) ZF - good
5) BRD - neutral
6) BRD - bizarre. group was really good. tank was really bad. pally who would not consecrate 'it takes too much mana', could not hold aggro, and ninja'd a haste cloak from me because 'it has stamina' XD
7) BRD - neutral - tank dropped group when Angerforge didn't drop her item
8) ST - bad
9) BRD - bad, tank pulled whole bar way over thaar, while we were smashing barrels. then had a hissy fit. also, another pally tank who wouldn't ever ever EVER consecrate. Not even when I was tanking all the adds (healer).
10) BRD - good - great tank, great group, some loldeaths in the bar, but really nice in general
11) Ramparts - good
12) Slave Pens - good
13) Blood Furnace - good (all three by same group - so could be skewed here)

The Psychology Of Cheating In Video Games Free

Without Priming
1) DM - N/A incompetank, didn't have time to hit the macro, didn't stay past the first 2 pulls. Yes, that bad.Video
2) ST - Good
3) BRD - bizarre. So many wipes. But people were good natured. Accidentally pulling Drakkisath cause tank didn't SEE him... is classic. XD
4) Ramparts - Good... but - idiot WotLK babies for DPS. Tank was the best I've had in 60 levels, and she was only 59. Extremely tough, amazing aggro (idiots pulled boss, no problems), and she was marking kill target as it came up. Professional. And they were making fun of her for it.
5) BF - Good
6) BF - Bad/bizarre - incredibly INCREDIBLY squishy DK tank. Like healing a mage. He needed shield AND renew at all times, and penance always on CD, with flash heal spamming as well. Couldn't hold aggro so good - I kept being silenced because he wasn't holding the attention of the silencing mobs. And to top it all off, he was wearing a skirt. A skirt. Blizzard doesn't put tanks in skirts, that I remember, unless it's druid leather... So glad I got gear upgrades and talents. -_-
7) UB - Neutral
8) AC - Good

Psychology Today Video Games

...going to have to stop this for now. the BC section, and I'm told WotLK section is so faceroll that I never run out of mana no matter how stupid the group is being. Makes it very hard to judge.